Red Dirt Report
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Advertising About Us Contact Us
ad
ad ad ad ad

Otter Limits: No more Twinkies?!?

Story Image
Paul J. Richards / Agence France-Presse
Hostess Twinkies and Ding Dongs to be no more.

By Steve Long

The Otter Limits

Posted: November 16, 2012

EDMOND, Okla. -- No more Twinkies. No more Ho-Hos. No more Ding Dongs. No more Fruit Pies. No more Wonder bread. What a sad day indeed.

Almost a year after filing for bankruptcy, Hostess announced today that it was closing its doors.

Hostess was founded in 1930 in Kansas City by Ralph Nafziger. Originally called Interstate Bakeries, it was started as a wholesale bread manufacturer.

On January 10, 2012, it filed for bankruptcy. This was actually the second time the company had filed for bankruptcy, the first time having been in 2004.

Interestingly enough, the company stated in its bankruptcy filing that the reason it was not able to stay afloat was due to loss of profits due to obligations to union pensions and medical benefits and restrictive work rules, set forth by the labor union that represents its employees. That union, not surprisingly, is the Teamsters Union.

It was reported in July that the union was going to agree with a cut in employee pay and benefits if the company agreed to maintain the pension program. That deal never came to fruition though because earlier this month, the company's employees went on strike.

And what was the response by the company to the strike? They lay off most of its employees, which numbers nearly 20,000 people and sell off all of its assets.

I really have to say, as I have said before, that labor unions are not the pure bastion of employee protection that they once were. In fact, and I have said this before too, it has gotten to the point that labor unions have become obsolete. There is no reason for them to exist anymore and this situation with Hostess is yet another example of why the organized labor movement does more harm than good.

Labor unions are supposed to help their members and the result of their efforts here just put nearly 20,000 people out of a job.

With the economic climate the way it currently is, and with unemployment already being so high, causing so many people to be out of work is going to drive us further off that fiscal cliff we keep hearing about.

This is the reason that I believe a national right to work law is so important. If all of these employees at Hostess had the right to choose whether or not they were going to belong to this union and had the choice to pick between siding with the union on their demands and keeping their jobs, I'm almost 100% certain they would choose to keep their jobs. These people aren't idiots. Well, then again, maybe they are for siding with the labor union.

Another recently union-related story is regarding the electrical workers union up in New Jersey. There was a group of electricians that came up to volunteer their time to help out in getting New Jersey's power restored but they were turned away because they were not union electricians. Really? Really people? Thousands of people not getting electricity because of a terrible storm, other people volunteering to help, and they get turned away because they aren't union?!? This is absolutely disgusting to me.

I believe that the time is right for a national right-to-work law in the United States. People need to be given a choice on whether or not they belong to a union. Labor unions have become nothing more than political machines that are only in the game to maintain their own political and financial power and in my opinion, these unions need to be brought down.

A national right-to-work law would put these labor unions in their place and force them to give potential employees an incentive for taking their money out of their paychecks and remaining union members. These labor unions simply need to give these employees a reason to stay with the union.

In the past few years, I have read entirely too many stories about problems with labor unions. The teachers' strikes in Washington state a couple years back (which are, by the way,illegal) is an example. And there was the potential of Boeing leaving the state of Washington for a right-to-work state because of the constant striking by the machinists union there.

Then there was the labor movement in Wisconsin unsuccessfully working to get Gov. Scott Walker removed from office. And most recently, the failure to reach a deal between the National Hockey League Players Association and the league itself, possibly shutting down the entire 2012-2013 hockey season.

Things like these are just adding fuel to the fire in the anti-labor union movement. They (the labor unions) want to be seen as the champions of the working man but events like the Hostess layoff are certainly not winning them any fans.

Here is an article that was in the Florida Times-Union regarding the situation.

Copyright 2012 The Otter Limits

Comments

Please leave a comment!
Only one comment per visit please.

Name:
Comment:

cracker Nov 18, 2012
I applaud the shutting down of this company for whatever reason. Their products were some of the unhealthiest garbage ever provided for the public to eat. White sugar, corn syrup, artificial flavors, dyes, nutritionally worthless white flour and other deadly substances have been fed to innocent children for decades. How many diabetics have been created by eating this unhealthy junk, and how many tens of billions of dollars have been wasted on unnecessary health costs as a result? If we had a functioning Food and Drug administration, it would be illegal to sell this kind of poisonous stuff in the US. Bye, bye, Hostess. You won't be missed.
John Galt Nov 17, 2012
This a very good article about a real problem in our country. May all unions got away before all the jobs go away .
Redscout Nov 17, 2012
New York gave the dock workers a.guaranteed job for life in 1954 and now there are bery few dockworker jobs in News York because the contracto caused rates to go artificially high. Nissan has not unions and not bailouts. Gm has unions and bailouts and lost many millions last year. Unions , especially.public workers unions are the curse of the country. People who will never be around to payroll pensión benefits grants these benefits to public employees and the tax payer is.left to pocket up the bill .
Steve Long Nov 17, 2012
No Brain. You are right on the money.
The Brain Nov 16, 2012
You are right about the Boeing issue. South Carolina proved to be a good fit. The unions seem to be in their death throes right now, or maybe I'm misreading this?
Steve Long Nov 16, 2012
And it is certainly your right to disagree with my column. I respectfully disagree with your statement that unions protect people. Here is a link that provides a partial list of companies whose employees were represented by the Teamsters (just one labor union among many) that have gone out of business. http://www.1-888-no-union.com/teamstersoutofbusiness.html Labor unions are obsolete in this day and age. They were originally organized to make certain improvements to the workplace such as the elimination of child labor, the establishment of the 8-hour work day, the improvement of the safety and health of workers, and improvement of wages. So...now there are child labor laws, there is a standard 8 hour work day, unions are unnecessary in regards to safety and health due to OSHA, and there are minimum wage laws in place. The labor movement can be applauded for working to make changes in these areas. I won't deny them that. But what do labor unions have to offer their employees now other than yet another deduction on their paychecks and the possible loss of their jobs due to frivolous demands for more rights? I am just saying that for the most part the time for labor unions has come and gone and it is time for the country to enact a national right to work law. That way, is an employee wants to belong to a union for whatever that reason might be, they have that right. But, if another employee wants to work for the same company but not be a union member, they should have that option. It is a fact that to large manufacturing companies, states that don't have right to work laws are less attractive than those that do when decided where to place a new facility. Take Boeing for example. Why do you think Boeing chose to put a facility in South Carolina, a right to work state, instead of just expanding their operation in the Seattle, Washington area? Washington isn't a right to work state and Boeing has had way too many production slowdowns due to the constant striking of their machinist union. But yeah. Unions protect the people. Sure.
Peter MacLean Nov 16, 2012
Unions protect the people. I disagree with your column, sir.