Red Dirt Report
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Advertising About Us Contact Us
ad
ad ad ad ad

Conservative View - Agriculture and bold experiments

Story Image
Andrew W. Griffin / Red Dirt Report
Russell Turner writes "The Conservative View"

By Russell Turner

Posted: October 1, 2012

STILWELL, Okla. -- We Americans have a bad habit of taking things for granted. One of the biggest subjects, is that of having an abundant and endless supply of food. When you stroll down the aisle of your local supermarket it is amazing what a huge selection of food is at our fingertips. I have read stories about people coming to our country, and the first thing that they want to see is an American supermarket. Most people in our country have little understanding of how agriculture works and the factors that allow us to have the selection of food that we enjoy. Recently I read a story that stated in 2013 our country and the rest of the world will experience a shortage of pork.

While there are many factors that can influence the availability of any food product, this year’s extended drought is one factor, but a bigger factor is the use of corn to make ethanol in our gasoline products. Over the past several years our government has been subsidizing the production of ethanol because it is supposed to cause less air pollution than regular gasoline. While that claim may or may not be true, the production of ethanol has caused a huge shortage of livestock feed.

One of the main ingredients in most livestock feed is corn. The drought in America has affected 90% of the continental United States. Due to the increased cost of livestock feed, many producers are forced to sell their animals. While most of them will go to slaughter, and in turn will cause prices for a short period of time to go down in the supermarket, when that glut is gone supply will fall and prices will rise. The shortages could double the price per pound for pork by next summer.  

Ethanol has never fulfilled the promises that its proponents have claimed. If it is such a good thing why does the government still provide subsidies for companies to produce it? I have the belief that if something is economically feasible the private sector will sell it and produce a profit. Our country has had its experiment with gasohol, and because of it we are about to experience a huge jump in the cost of food that all of us must have. We have many better options than ethanol. Over the past several years technology has increased that will allow our nation to be self sufficient for our gasoline needs if our government will start allowing drilling on public lands. The availability of natural gas could supply our energy needs for several centuries to come. I am afraid that many Americans are about to get a first hand education in agriculture and its cost because of the government’s bold experiment with ethanol.

Copyright 2012 Russell Turner

Comments

Please leave a comment!
Only one comment per visit please.

Name:
Comment:

sshxjqhqhb Nov 05, 2012
dusbcV , [url=http://ntsyuvgiranp.com/]ntsyuvgiranp[/url], [link=http://jdtulpnmzbnt.com/]jdtulpnmzbnt[/link], http://abpvimnlnduv.com/
hegomoqgm Nov 03, 2012
VTai2e , [url=http://kigndbjznqzg.com/]kigndbjznqzg[/url], [link=http://foephegbdeto.com/]foephegbdeto[/link], http://ndhookucjnlj.com/
Anu Nov 01, 2012
"In the feeble minds of the conrcisapy kooks, everything is a US conrcisapy to keep the people down. There's no need for evidence or facts or even a real motive."The motive is always to protect the US's strategic interests. And yes, the US gov't actually does conspire to make international policy with our strategic interests in mind, whether or not they intend the fallout is debatable. Haitian examples: We did not recognize Haiti's independence until 1862 (hmmm.. what else happened that year?) Why did we OCCUPY Haiti from 1915 to 1934 (I'll give you a hint--it has to do with world events and strategic interests? Why would we send in the Marines during times of political instability, over and over again? The US gov't does things to weaker countries to protect our "strategic interests" all the time and many of them end badly like: arm and train the mujahideen to make bombs to fight the Soviets (result: the CIA ghost authored the Al-Qaeda training manual),we supported the military coup and resulting assassination of Patrice Lumumba that put Joseph Mobutu in power in DRC and we helped keep him there for 30+ years while he robbed his people blind in exchange for access to strategic mining interests (ruining DRC and touching off instability in most the region for 10 years and counting after his ouster), we sold weapons to our enemy Iran (not mention while at the same time selling them to our "ally" and BFF Sadam in Iraq) and forwarding the proceeds to support guerillas fighting against an overwhelmingly elected (75% in a free, fair election mind you) socialist gov't in Nicaragua (creating "evil Sadam" and "still evil Iran" and destabilizing Central America for several years.) This is all common knowledge. Face it, international relations is a dirty business and most of our handouts have string attached. There are no Toby Keith songs inspired by this kind of stuff, but it is part of why we have it so good. They don't want Haitians to starve per se, it is just the by-product of an exclusive trade relationship regarding those shipments "Miami rice" mentioned earlier. You can blame the 3rd World/Haitians for this if you'd like, but the US is complicit in all these examples, at best.
redscout Oct 01, 2012
They will make food stuff, artificial pork out of natural gas and then we would come full circle on stupid