Red Dirt Report
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Advertising About Us Contact Us
ad
ad ad ad ad

Inhofe defends Obama sending 100 'advisors' to Uganda

Story Image
RDR file photo
U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.)

By Andrew W. Griffin

Red Dirt Report, editor

Posted: October 18, 2011

reddirtreporter@gmail.com

OKLAHOMA CITY – With our current poll showing the majority of Red Dirt Report readers are skeptical or out-right against the newly-hatched American intervention in Uganda and east-central Africa, one of the craftsmen in Congress of the so-called “Plan Uganda” operation, U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), is defending the this U.S. foreign policy move and our involvement there, as approved by Congress.

We wrote several stories since Friday on the issue, which can be found here, here and here. Two members of the Oklahoma congressional delegation responded to our inquiries about the "Plan Uganda" operation.

The Obama administration, with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta taking the lead, has been getting criticized for their late Friday afternoon “invasion by press release.” Panetta finally sat down with CBS News and said that the 100 American troops being sent to Uganda is to monitor the “elements there that either have ties to al Qaeda or that represent the forces of terrorism on their own. And that’s what’s dangerous.”

So, Panetta is indicating that real problems could arise if crazed, religious-minded terrorists get a foothold in areas of Africa that, at least up to this point, have been supportive of U.S. operations - the crisis could worsen. Right now, Uganda has willingly accepted a portion of the $45 million aid package sent to that country and to Burundi this year - along with four drones - in an effort to fight rebels and terrorists coming from other areas of East Africa, according to a June 28, 2011 BBC article.

Red Dirt Report spoke with Inhofe’s press spokesman Jared Young on Tuesday afternoon, it is clear that the American public and media has not been given the full story on the violent and brutal Lord’s Resistance Army cult and the loosely affiliated terrorist organizations connected to them.

Stability in this area of Africa is key, argues Inhofe, who helped author the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009, and has spent much time in sub-Saharan Africa as we have reported.

In response to the idea that the LRA “does not pose a significant national security threat to the United States, Inhofe’s office responds, primarily towards comments made last Friday by conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh.

“The LRA is responsible for one of the longest, most violent conflicts on the continent of Africa and continues to destabilize the countries of Central Africa…, millions have been displaced, tens of thousands have died, and it is estimated that more than 30,000 children have been kidnapped and either killed, or turned into ‘Child Soldiers’ or sex slaves.”

Inhofe and his office refute claims that the LRA are of the Christian religion. Rather, they note, “The LRA is a brutal cult with (Joseph) Kony as their messianic leader.” To drive that point home, Inhofe reminds the media of the brutal and vicious nature of the LRA and their attacks on innocent Africans. From kidnapping women and children to “using HIV/AIDS infected soldiers as weapons of biological mass destruction” by raping villagers so they infect the rest of the community. Sadistic tortures, maimings and cleansing the land of “evil people” and government collaborators is commonplace, they note.

So, why are American advisors going to Uganda and neighboring countries? Well, Inhofe defends this saying that “US forces are already engaged with over 50 countries worldwide.” And when it comes to the African continent, minus the Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya, Inhofe’s office says that there are over 1,000 U.S. troops are operating in over 20 African countries, from Algeria to Tanzania, involved with operations addressing everything from “intelligence fusion” to “special ops.”

“This isn’t like going into Libya, Kosovo or Somalia,” Young said. “These are trained and equipped military advisors like we have had in Iraq and Afghanistan.” This area of Africa – and specifically Anglophone Uganda – is of “national strategic importance.”

Asked more specifically about Uganda, spokesman Young said the senator understands that “it’s a region of the world that most Americans don’t pay much attention to” and that they “don’t understand the issues related to sub-Saharan Africa.”

Specifically addressing the Lord’s Resistance Army, Young said they are evident not only in Uganda but in South Sudan and Central African Republic, and possibly other nearby countries.

“What they are doing is destabilizing the area,” Young said of the LRA. “And that destabilization makes it ripe for extremist activity.”

One of the extremist groups, the Islamist “al-Shabaab network,” based primarily in lawless Somalia is one of those groups. Interestingly, the neighboring Kenyan government announced this week that Kenyan troops were entering Somalia to fight the al-Shabaab terrorists.

Noting that these terrorist groups and networks are not like a McDonald’s franchise, they are a “loosely affiliated group” and “have their own ties.”

Young said his office and the senator were puzzled by the Obama administration’s decision to release this information on a “dump day” like Friday.

“It shows (Obama) doesn’t get it, which isn’t a big shock,” Young added.

Red Dirt Report has wanted to know more about Inhofe’s interest in African issues and wanted to know about 1.) How much will this cost? 2.) What concerns do we have with China in the region? 3.) What about Inhofe and his support of Uganda’s dictator Yoweri Museveni, who recently allowed his troops to recently displace – brutally, we should add – “squatters” on land belonging to a British corporation. 4.) What about the sub-Saharan Africans in Libya being brutally beaten or murdered by U.S.-supported rebels? 5.) What about all those Ugandan “troops” who took American cash to protect U.S. bases in Iraq in recent years? Why aren’t they taking on the LRA? 6.) What role does your Christian faith – and your involvement with the so-called “Family” - play in your dealings with African leaders? 7.) And with American forces stretched thin around the globe, is getting involved in yet another foreign battle zone conservative and wise?

And those are just a few questions we have. As for the rest of the media and this Uganda operation, Young said that on late Friday, calls for Inhofe came from everyone from the Fox News Channel to National Public Radio.

“This morning he did an interview with a D.C.-based conservative radio talk show,” added Young.

And Young acknowledged that the prominent Republican has a heart for Africa.

Said Young: “He’s been to the area a number of times and knows the country quite well.”

We hope to get a chance to speak to Sen. Inhofe and get him to share his thoughts on these important geopolitical issues.

Copyright 2011 West Marie Media

Comments

Please leave a comment!
Only one comment per visit please.

Name:
Comment:

Lorin Nov 06, 2011
I bow down humbly in the presence of such grteeanss.
V.T Oct 20, 2011
Why jugde on this 25 year long war, when you don't know what the crap you are talking about. When people hear the work "lord" they think that they are a christian group. Peolpe think obama sent troops to fight christian. IT'S NOT TURE. The LRA is not a chisrtain group. Advisors and troops were sent to remove Joseph Kony from the battle field! Theres a difference. The troops are not allowed to "combat fight" the LRA. Instead they are helping the Ugandan Military by giving them tips and helping them train. The troops will only ingage in battle for self defense. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFROE YOU START TRASH TALKING OTHER PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!
K.W. Oct 20, 2011
Regardless of whether or not you agree with the president's ideology, you have to admit that he has been on a roll lately when it comes to knocking off terrorist leaders. Remember when the debate was about how he wasn't strong enough on defense? Now the concern seems to be that he's getting too involved. Maybe he's a closet hawk?
wally27 Oct 20, 2011
When are we gonna get some justice for the terrorism in Waco, TX, April 19, 1993? Still waiting. The international terrorists are in Washington DC, and Jerusalem, not Uganda.
R. Brown Oct 19, 2011
With pretty much the same things going on on our own southern border, and in northern Mexico, why won't he, and our government, support putting American troops on our own borders to defend them and put an end to it? Seems like our government will put our troops ANYWHERE but here, where their primary duty is, which is to defend our borders and coasts from invasion. We ARE being INVADED, tens of thousands of Americans have DIED at the hands of illegal aliens since 9-11, more than the number of U.S. troops who died in Vietnam, Tucson has become the kidnapping capital of the U.S.A, with whole families being held for ransom in Mexico, and our government does NOTHING. Meanwhile, they routinely send our military to prop up brutal dictators all over the globe. And they wonder why so many Americans are taking to the streets against Wall Street, and the Federal Reserve, who are behind all of this insanity?
Eamon Oct 19, 2011
I am sure Uganda's recent oil discovery had nothing to do with the decision.
MountainHome Oct 19, 2011
Libya and now Uganda. Couldn't all of this money be used back home instead of traveling the world spending it?
Andrew W. Griffin Oct 19, 2011
Inhofe appeared on "The Pat Campbell Show" this morning to talk about our just-announced involvement in Uganda. Glad Pat is helping to get this out there!
BJ Oct 18, 2011
I wonder if this not the development of a new group of "bad guys". It took about 15 years for Bin Lauden and his gang of merry makers to develop from an obscure mention in Oliver Notrh's Congressional testimonials to the 9/11 scape-goats. Back then Afghanistan seemed as remote as Somalia. Since there is a village in Kenya missing its idiot, who knows how the Warmonger(s) in charge will bill this new group to be worthy of a future act of aggression.
Delbert Oct 18, 2011
I probably would not be so skeptical about this if we hadn't already heard this same song and dance about another religious centered group called All-CIA-duh or Al-quida or however it is spelled.
Henry Oct 18, 2011
And at the conclusion of the great battle ... "O God thy arm was here; And not to us, but to thy arm alone, Ascribe we all! When, without stratagem, but in plain shock and even play of battle, Was ever known so great and little loss On one part and on th' other? Take it, God For it is none but thine."
Hamlet Oct 18, 2011
To invade or not to invade. That seems to be the question. Whether it is better to suffer the continued horrors of this cult or to take up arms and end it. To have peace, perhaps development. And who would be in charge ? There is the rub. What devils lurk in these dreams of the future. Such doubt should give is pause . S, o before we shuffle of this mortal coil , leave us consider the skull of young Yorik all the young Yoriks left as a silent reminder of all our yesteryears. I fear the King has blood on his hands , yet the court blames him not. Enough.